Washington, D.C. – The U.S. Senate floor was the stage for a heated exchange this week as Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) delivered a blistering critique of Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and the group of progressive congresswomen known as “The Squad.” Kennedy’s remarks, which quickly went viral, reignited the national debate over patriotism, free speech, and the boundaries of dissent in American politics.
The Louisiana Senator, known for his folksy wit and blunt assessments, did not mince words. “When you argue with a fool, you just prove there are two,” Kennedy quipped, before launching into a direct attack on Omar and her allies: Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA). “They hate America,” Kennedy declared. “They think America was wicked in its origins, and it’s even more wicked today. They ought to be thanking America instead of calling America evil and wicked and racist.”
The crowd—both in the chamber and online—erupted with applause and praise from conservative circles, echoing the sentiment that Kennedy had finally said what many have long been thinking.
The “Send Her Back” Flashpoint
The controversy traces back to 2019, when then-President Donald Trump tweeted that certain progressive congresswomen should “go back” to the countries they “originally came from” if they were unhappy in America. Though Trump did not name anyone, the comments were widely interpreted as targeting Omar and other members of the Squad, all U.S. citizens, three of whom were born in the United States. The backlash was immediate, with critics labeling the remarks as racist and xenophobic, while supporters defended them as a call for gratitude and assimilation.
Senator Kennedy revisited this moment, saying, “I thought the president’s original tweet was a poor choice of words. I think I know what the president meant, and he clarified later and said, ‘Look, if you’re not happy in America, leave. Just leave.’ And I agree with that.” Kennedy further argued that the Squad’s worldview was “destroying the Democratic Party,” and even joked that, “if I didn’t know better, I would think the members of the Squad were GOP plants.”
The Squad Responds: Accusations of Racism and Islamophobia
Predictably, the exchange did not go unchallenged. Progressive lawmakers and their supporters called out what they described as a double standard and a thinly veiled attack on women of color in Congress. Representative Ocasio-Cortez, in a fiery floor speech, said, “Don’t tell me this is about consistency. Don’t tell me that this is about condemnation of anti-Semitic remarks when you have a member of the Republican caucus who has talked about Jewish space lasers and an entire amount of tropes and also elevated her to some of the highest committee assignments in this body. This is about targeting women of color in the United States of America.”
Omar herself, who arrived in the U.S. as a Somali refugee and has become a symbol of both the American Dream and the country’s ongoing struggles with diversity and inclusion, has repeatedly faced accusations of anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism. She has denied these claims, arguing that her criticisms of U.S. foreign policy and domestic inequality are rooted in a desire to make America live up to its founding ideals.
The Underlying Issues: Patriotism, Dissent, and the American Idea
At the heart of the debate is a fundamental disagreement about what it means to love one’s country. For Kennedy and his supporters, patriotism means gratitude and loyalty to the nation that provides freedom and opportunity. “America gave her safety, prosperity, and a path all the way to Congress,” Kennedy said of Omar. “And instead of gratitude, she responds with contempt. That’s not just hypocrisy. That’s deliberate disrespect toward the country that saved her life.”
For Omar and the Squad, true patriotism means holding the country accountable for its shortcomings and striving to build a more just society. “We are no longer going to allow the dignification of such ridiculous statements,” Omar said in a previous speech, referring to demands that Muslims condemn terrorism. “It’s beyond time to ask Muslims to condemn terrorists. We are Americans. We belong here.”
This clash of perspectives is not new. Throughout American history, waves of immigrants and marginalized groups have faced suspicion and hostility when they have challenged the status quo. From the Irish and Italians in the 19th century to the civil rights activists of the 1960s, dissent has often been met with accusations of disloyalty.
The Political Stakes: The Squad and the Democratic Party
Kennedy’s comments also reflect a broader Republican strategy: to paint the Democratic Party as beholden to its most radical members. “They think that illegal immigration, socialism, higher taxes, abortion are all moral goods. They think America, Israel, free enterprise are moral bads. That’s not what most Americans believe,” Kennedy argued.
This narrative has proven effective in energizing the GOP base and putting moderate Democrats on the defensive. Polls show that while the Squad is popular among progressives, their positions are less popular with the general electorate. Issues like the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and calls to “defund the police” have become lightning rods in the culture wars.
Yet, the Squad’s influence within the Democratic Party should not be overstated. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and President Joe Biden have often distanced themselves from the group’s most controversial proposals, emphasizing a more centrist approach.
The Left’s Response: Charges of Hypocrisy and White Supremacy
Progressives, meanwhile, accuse Republicans of selective outrage and hypocrisy. “Don’t tell me because I didn’t get a single appointment when my life was threatened,” Ocasio-Cortez said, referencing threats she and other members of the Squad have received. “The representative can say whatever the heck she wants. But we don’t have to accept it or embrace it. Individuals who hold such hateful views should rightly be barred from that type of committee.”
Others, like Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO), have gone further, describing the attacks on Omar as “blatantly Islamophobic and racist.” “The white supremacy happening is unbelievable. This is despicable,” Bush said.
Republicans counter that their criticism is about policy, not identity. “We just do not believe when it comes to foreign affairs, especially the responsibility of that position around the world with the comments that you make. She shouldn’t serve there,” one GOP lawmaker said of Omar.
The Media’s Role: Amplifying or Ignoring the Debate?
Conservative media outlets have celebrated Kennedy’s remarks as a long-overdue “smackdown” of the Squad, while accusing mainstream outlets of ignoring the story. “The mainstream media is pretending it never happened,” one commentator said. “If more Republicans had his backbone, America would turn things around faster than the media could panic tweet about it.”
In reality, the debate over Omar, the Squad, and the meaning of patriotism has been a staple of cable news and social media for years. What is new is the way in which these debates are increasingly filtered through partisan echo chambers, with little room for nuance or compromise.
The Broader Context: Immigration, Integration, and American Identity
The debate over Omar and the Squad is ultimately a debate about who gets to define what it means to be American. For some, the answer is assimilation and gratitude; for others, it is activism and dissent.
Omar’s story is emblematic of the American Dream: a refugee who rose to become a member of Congress. But it is also a reminder of the challenges that come with integration and the persistence of nativism and suspicion toward newcomers.
Kennedy’s remarks, while cheered by many, also highlight the risks of reducing complex debates to soundbites and slogans. “When you argue with a fool, you just prove there are two,” he said. But in a democracy, the marketplace of ideas is supposed to be messy, contentious, and open to all.
Conclusion: What Comes Next?
As the 2024 election approaches, the debate over Omar, the Squad, and the meaning of American identity is unlikely to fade. Both parties see political advantage in the clash, and both are eager to define the terms of the debate.
For Kennedy and his supporters, the message is clear: America is a land of opportunity, and those who benefit from its freedoms should show gratitude, not contempt. For Omar and her allies, patriotism means fighting for a better America, even if that means challenging its history and its leaders.
What is certain is that the stakes are high. As Kennedy warned, “If their radicalism goes unchecked, it won’t just wreck the Democratic party, it’ll wreck the entire country.” His critics, meanwhile, argue that silencing dissent is the real threat to democracy.
In the end, the question is not just about Ilhan Omar or the Squad. It is about what kind of country America wants to be—and whether it can find room for both gratitude and criticism, tradition and change, unity and dissent.
.