Former teammate Paula Scanlan conveyed a feeling of relief after the decision to prohibit Lia Thomas from participating in the Olympics, reigniting the heated discussion surrounding transgender athletes in women’s sports. Scanlan utilized social media to call for an apology for what she characterized as being “forced to undress” with Thomas several times each week.
The announcement was made on Wednesday following Thomas’s defeat in her legal attempt to overturn regulations that barred her from competing due to her transgender status. Scanlan’s tweet on X highlighted her viewpoint: “Okay, but is anyone going to apologize for forcing us to undress with him 18 times a week?”
Thomas attracted significant attention in March 2022 when she became the first transgender athlete to secure the women’s NCAA college swimming title. Despite her achievements, World Aquatics (WA) later implemented rules that prohibited individuals who had experienced any aspect of male puberty from competing in female categories, redirecting transgender athletes to an “open” category.
Dissatisfied with these regulations, Thomas initiated legal proceedings through the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to contest what she perceived as discriminatory limitations. However, the CAS panel’s ruling, based on technical grounds, confirmed that Thomas was ineligible to compete in WA events, including the Olympics, as she was no longer part of US swimming.
In reaction to the ruling, Thomas expressed profound disappointment via her legal representatives, condemning the decision as discriminatory and depriving transgender women of essential athletic opportunities that are vital to their identities. Supporters like Sarah Kate Ellis from GLAAD rallied in support of Thomas, underscoring her right to compete and pursue her athletic aspirations free from discrimination.
In contrast, Scanlan, who swam with Thomas at the University of Pennsylvania, embraced the decision and expressed her views on social media, reflecting concerns regarding women’s privacy and safety in athletics. Her outspoken opposition to Thomas’ involvement in women’s sports included testimony before the House Judiciary Subcommittee, where she shared personal experiences and advocated for prioritizing physical safety in gender-segregated environments.
Scanlan’s resistance to Thomas competing as a woman arises from broader issues of fairness and the integrity of women’s sports, resonating with sentiments voiced by numerous conservative advocates. Her efforts focus on ensuring fair opportunities for female athletes and safeguarding spaces that have traditionally been designated for women.
While Thomas asserts her identity as a woman and her entitlement to participate in women’s sports, Scanlan’s position highlights the ongoing tensions and unresolved issues regarding the inclusion of transgender athletes in competitive sports. As the discussion continues to evolve, Scanlan remains resolute in her conviction that protecting women’s sports is essential, advocating for policies that maintain fairness and inclusivity without undermining women’s rights and safety.