For years, the unresolved questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s associates, activities, and legal history have fueled public curiosity and intense scrutiny. Now, one of the most prominent attorneys connected to Epstein’s past legal battles, Alan Dershowitz, says he is attempting to release documents he believes would shed new light on the case — but claims he is being blocked by judicial orders that prevent him from disclosing sealed material.
Appearing Wednesday on Piers Morgan Uncensored, Dershowitz spoke directly into the camera and issued a public appeal to the judge overseeing the sealed records. According to Dershowitz, these documents are in his possession, but he cannot lawfully release them unless the court grants permission.
“I have them in my possession — my lawyers have them,” Dershowitz said. “Judge, let me give them to Piers Morgan. I want to give them to Piers Morgan. Why, Judge, are you preventing me from disclosing material that would be very important in putting a whole picture on this thing?”
His comments immediately stirred debate, adding a new layer to the broader public fight over transparency surrounding the Epstein investigation — one that has only intensified as additional documents surface and political pressure mounts.
A Dispute Over What the Documents Represent
Moments before Dershowitz appeared, Piers Morgan Uncensored featured guest Mike Nellis, a former adviser to then-Senator Kamala Harris and the founder of a political technology firm. Nellis pushed back on Dershowitz’s characterization of the documents.
Nellis argued that the material in Dershowitz’s control likely represents “about 3%” of what could be considered the larger Epstein archive. He said the public focus should be on the enormous volume of documents held by the Justice Department, federal courts, the FBI, and Epstein’s estate — many of which remain sealed or unreleased.
According to Nellis, “the Justice Department and the White House could end this at any time” by facilitating the release of all Epstein-related files, which he claims number in the tens of thousands of pages.
Dershowitz forcefully rejected that idea.
“No, they can’t,” he responded.
“It will never end as long as judges are sealing depositions. I know what’s in those documents. I know something you don’t know. I know what’s in those documents. That’s why it’s so important to get these judicial documents out there — if the judge will give me permission.”
The back-and-forth highlights the ongoing tension between public demands for transparency and the legal constraints surrounding sealed judicial material, attorney-client privilege, and confidential settlements.
Attorney-Client Privilege and the Limits of Disclosure
Dershowitz’s involvement in the Epstein saga stretches back more than a decade. As one of Epstein’s defense attorneys, he remains bound by attorney-client privilege, even after Epstein’s death in 2019. This means that any information Epstein communicated to him directly, or any documents generated as part of Epstein’s legal defense, cannot be released without authorization from a court.
“People often forget that privilege doesn’t end just because a client dies,” said one legal analyst not affiliated with Dershowitz. “If the judge sealed the material and the client is deceased, the attorney still has obligations unless the court lifts the seal.”
Dershowitz appears to be arguing that the documents he wants released are not protected by privilege and are instead sealed judicial documents that he believes should be public. Whether the court agrees remains an open question.
New Releases Put Fresh Spotlight on Epstein Case
The renewed public attention coincides with several new developments that have brought the Epstein affair back into the political spotlight.
1. Newly Released Emails Referencing Donald Trump
Earlier this week, previously sealed emails tied to Epstein’s communications were released, including messages in which Epstein reportedly made pointed comments about former President Donald Trump. Although the contents of those emails have not been fully detailed publicly, their emergence has reignited debates over who Epstein interacted with, what he discussed with high-profile individuals, and what those interactions may have meant.
2. 20,000 Pages of Epstein Estate Records Released
In addition to the email release, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform published approximately 20,000 pages of material from Epstein’s estate. These documents include financial records, internal communications, travel logs, and administrative notes that could provide new insight into Epstein’s network of associates.
According to a press release from the committee, the documents were released “to support ongoing investigations into Epstein’s activities, his financial dealings, and the individuals and institutions that interacted with him.”
The committee has not indicated whether additional releases are forthcoming, though members of Congress have signaled that transparency remains a priority.
Dershowitz’s Larger Argument: ‘Make It All Public’
Though he remains a controversial figure in the broader Epstein narrative, Dershowitz has consistently argued that all documents — not just those involving others, but also any that mention him — should be made public.
He said his motivation has two parts:
- Clearing the record: Dershowitz has been accused in civil litigation connected to Epstein, allegations he has vigorously denied. He maintains that sealed documents contain information that would exonerate him.
- Public transparency: Dershowitz says the American public deserves a complete picture of how Epstein operated and which institutions played a role in enabling or overlooking misconduct.
“I want everything out,” Dershowitz has repeatedly stated in previous interviews. “Every document, every deposition, every detail.”
His critics argue that Dershowitz’s appeals are self-interested, but his insistence on unsealing all records — including those involving himself — has complicated that critique.
Why Judges May Be Blocking Release
Legal experts say there are several reasons a judge may be preventing Dershowitz from releasing the files he claims to have:
1. Protecting Witness Privacy
Many depositions in the Epstein case include sensitive details involving individuals who were never charged with crimes. Courts often keep these materials sealed to protect privacy rights.
2. Ongoing Investigations
Some sealed records may relate to investigations that remain active. Releasing them prematurely could interfere with federal or state inquiries.
3. Confidential Settlements
Epstein and his associates were involved in numerous civil settlements that included non-disclosure agreements. Courts typically respect those agreements unless challenged successfully.
4. Court Procedure Rules
Even if Dershowitz personally wants to release material, the court may require motions, hearings, and approval from multiple parties before any sealed document can become public.
Growing Public Pressure for Transparency
Despite the legal constraints, calls for full disclosure are growing louder. Advocates from across the political spectrum have argued that the Epstein case represents an unusual moment in which transparency is essential for public trust.
Many Americans believe that the full story of Epstein’s network has never been told — and that too many powerful individuals were shielded by legal protections, sealed records, and institutional failures.
The combination of newly released emails, the 20,000-page document dump, and Dershowitz’s public pleas have intensified expectations that more disclosures may be coming. Several lawmakers have indicated support for declassifying as much material as possible, though efforts to do so may take months or years.
What Happens Next?
Whether Dershowitz will be granted permission to release the documents remains uncertain. Judges overseeing sealed records rarely act based on public requests alone and may require formal motions from the parties involved.
In the meantime:
- Media outlets continue to request access to sealed Epstein records.
- Congressional committees may push for additional releases.
- Federal agencies could face pressure to declassify relevant files.
- Civil litigants are continuing to file motions seeking access to sealed material.
- Public interest remains strong as new disclosures emerge.
For now, Dershowitz’s documents remain locked behind judicial seals — but his public appeal has added new momentum to the broader debate over how much of the Epstein story the American public is entitled to see.